VALORISATION PLAN: Scientific Relevance and IP
| 1 | Please provide a short description of the state-of-the-art and/or current trends in the field? How does the result fit into it? |
|
|
| 2 | What is the problem/need/knowledge gap that the research result is responding to? How was it addressed before? |
| The research responds to the processing of high data volumes as necessary for the analysis of the earth surface or in disaster situations. The research provides algorithms that are carried out with parallel processing thus being able to show processed data in a very short time.
|
|
| 3 | What is the potential for further research? |
There is a high potential for further research in terms of:
|
|
| 4 | What is the proposed method of IPR-protection? (patent, license, trademark etc.) |
| No method for IPR protection has been proposed and may not be necessary since the research is mostly based on other existing research and provides novel results by application of such other results in different areas.
For a product environment, a trade name registration might be recommended.
|
|
| 5 | What are the steps that need to be taken in order to secure the IPR-protection? What is the cost of IPR-protection? |
| Should there be a resulting product, this might be protected by trademarks. It is likely that the chosen acronym BlueVision is already registered as a trademark.
|
|
| 6 | What is you overall assessment of the scientific maturity of the research result? |
| The scientific maturity is very high although more research will be necessary to demonstrate the full feasibility of the research approach in both scientific and technical terms.
|
|
KEYWORDS QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT (0-5).
| Please put X as appropriate. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Scientific maturity | X | ||||
| Synergies | X | ||||
| State-of-the-art/innovation | X | ||||
| IPR-potential | X |
ulrichboes
