IP protection




Please provide a short description of the state-of-the-art and/or current trends in the field. How does the result fit into it?
The state of the art provides very complex, heavy and expensive systems.

The team developed a powerful, more compact, simpler and less costly system.








What is the problem/need/knowledge gap that the research result is responding to?  How was it addressed before?
Beside the ease of use and the software, also the method of miniaturization of the system is very advantageous with respect to the state of the art








What is the potential for further research?
Adapting other cameras working, in different wavelengths in the system, in order to develop a modular system which provides the simultaneous use of more cameras working in different spectra and expanding the possible applications.








What is the proposed method of IPR-protection? (patent, license, trademark etc.)







What are the steps that need to be taken in order to secure the IPR-protection? What is the cost of IPR-protection?
Patentability could be taken into consideration for the modularity of the system, in particular for the use and management of more cameras that work with complementary spectrums

+ Protection with copyright for the software

+ Protection with trademark






What is your overall assessment of the scientific maturity of the research result?
The project is ready to be protected








Please put X as appropriate. 1 2 3 4 5
Scientific maturity         X
Synergies       X  
State-of-the-art/innovation       X  
IPR-potential         X




Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Request a proposal

Valorisation Plan Authors

Related Documents

There in no related documents

Visit the other applications of the INTERVALUE Platform: R&D Repository | IP Agreements

© 2009-2010 INTERVALUE Project